There are 41 prop firms in our current payout-tracking dataset, but the money is far from evenly distributed.
An analysis of the latest 30-day figures shows that just three firms — Tradeify Futures, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures — accounted for approximately $76.4 million in blockchain-verified payouts.
That’s nearly 68% of the $112.6 million recorded across all 41 tracked firms.
The remaining 38 firms accounted for approximately $36.2 million combined.
It’s a striking difference, and one worth examining more closely.
Which prop firms recorded the largest payouts?
Our snapshot, taken on 10 October 2026, shows the following:
| Prop firm | 30-day verified payouts |
|---|---|
| Tradeify Futures | $42.44 million |
| FundedNext | $18.80 million |
| MyFundedFutures | $15.18 million |
| Combined | $76.42 million |
Tradeify Futures alone represented approximately 37.7% of the total payout value tracked during this period.
The figures are substantial, but payout value isn’t the only interesting measurement.
Together, these three firms were responsible for 51,516 of the 79,051 recorded payout transactions — approximately 65.2%.
That means the concentration is visible in both the amount of money distributed and the number of recorded payments.
What does this tell us about the prop firm market?
One observation stands out: the three leading firms distributed more than twice as much as the other 38 tracked firms combined.
That doesn’t necessarily mean the remaining firms are struggling. Smaller firms naturally have fewer customers, and different payout methods can affect what appears in the tracking data.
Nevertheless, the difference highlights just how much recorded payout activity is concentrated among a relatively small number of firms.
For traders comparing providers, this offers another perspective beyond advertised account sizes, challenge prices and profit splits.
A firm’s demonstrated payout activity matters. But it should never be considered in isolation.
Does a higher payout total mean a better prop firm?
Not necessarily.
A company distributing millions of dollars may have a much larger customer base than its competitors. Higher overall payouts don’t tell us how many traders successfully pass evaluations, how many withdrawal requests are rejected or whether customers consistently receive their funds on time.
Those questions require different evidence.
Trading conditions also matter. Daily drawdown limits, consistency requirements, restrictions around economic news and withdrawal eligibility can have a direct effect on a trader’s experience.
A strong payout history is useful evidence of activity. It isn’t a guarantee of reliability or future payments.
That’s why My Trader Tools examines payout developments alongside trading rules, firm information and trader reviews.
What the figures don’t include
These statistics cover tracked payments recorded on public blockchains. They do not represent every payment made by every prop firm.
Bank transfers, card payments and other untracked payment methods may be absent from the figures.
The 41 firms are also a monitored group, not the entire prop trading industry.
For those reasons, the percentages describe the distribution of recorded payouts within this dataset, rather than the distribution of all payouts worldwide.
We’ll continue monitoring the figures
Payout activity changes daily, and the leading firms can change as older transactions leave the rolling 30-day window and new payments are recorded.
Our focus is on following those developments over time, identifying meaningful changes and giving traders information they can use when researching prop firms.
You can follow the latest figures through our Prop Firm Market Watch or compare individual companies on our Prop Firm Payouts page.
Data and methodology
This My Trader Tools analysis uses a snapshot recorded on 10 October 2026 at 09:01 UTC. Figures have been rounded for readability.
Underlying blockchain payout records are provided and verified by Payout Junction. My Trader Tools monitors the dataset, compares firm activity and provides independent editorial interpretation.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any prop firm.
